- Real Estate
- Food & Drink
Oct. 3, 2019
This paid piece is sponsored by Eide Bailly LLP.
We recently assisted the family of a husband and wife who owned land in Iowa as tenants in common. This means that each party owned one-half interest. The husband had passed away 20 years ago, and upon his death in 1989, his one-half interest was stepped up to fair market value. This one-half interest was transferred to his children, and his wife received a life estate. The children’s basis in the one-half interest was the 1989 value.
In 2018, the wife passed away, and her one-half interest was stepped up to full market value at her date of death. The children, in conjunction with the personal representative of their mom’s estate, sold the land in 2018. The one-half interest owned by the children — as remainder interest in their dad’s share — did not receive a basis step up on mom’s date of death, and, as a result, the total federal and Iowa income tax paid was approximately $350,000.
While the planning used in 1989 for ownership of the farmland was typical of the planning used at the time, a lot has changed in the past 20 years. For example, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act increased the federal gift and estate tax exemption from $5 million to $10 million indexed for inflation, making lifetime gifts a great strategy to consider. Even if you and your family have an estate plan in place, it’s important to periodically review the plan to make sure you aren’t missing out.
If the children had consulted with an estate planner or set up real-time monitoring regarding their parents’ assets, they would have realized that they should have considered transferring their remainder interest in their dad’s one-half interest to their mom. That way, their mom would have owned all the land at her date of death, and the entire basis would have been stepped up to full market value at her date of death. If this had been the case, there would have been no gain to report on the sale. Also with the increased exemption available to the surviving spouse, there would have been no additional federal or Iowa estate tax due.
A financial adviser also would have outlined the inherent risks of this new plan and analyzed whether these risks worked best with the family’s goals and objectives. If the children had opted to give their mother the remainder interest, there’s always the chance that their mom could have decided not to give the land back to them or not give it back to them in the same proportion. Also, if the mom had creditor issues, part of the land would have to be used to satisfy creditors, including nursing homes and other such care. Risks such as these are an important piece of the big-picture consideration.
A comprehensive wealth plan can help you examine pros and cons, take advantage of exemptions and look at your estate as a whole so you can see that big picture. Sitting down periodically with a professional to review and discuss plans is always beneficial — not only for your sake but also to make sure your family is protected in the future.
Contact Tom Pruner today to learn more.
They set up an estate plan decades ago and paid the price recently for not updating it. Review this cautionary tale — and make sure it doesn’t happen to you.